Why Rockstar Should End the Red Dead Redemption Saga Now

by

Red Dead Redemption 2 and its forerunner are considered among the finest video games ever crafted. They’re not just visually and structurally impressive, but their narratives are skillfully written, making them shine amidst a flood of overly sanitized and formulaic AAA productions. Today, even in competition with some of the most popular modern games, the Red Dead Redemption pair still holds its ground.

There is a strong demand from viewers for a third installment of the “Red Dead Redemption” series, with some assuming that it’s already in development, although Rockstar Games has yet to confirm this. Potential storylines could involve Sadie Adler’s bounty hunting journey or the adult life of Jack Marston, as continuations from the original game’s epilogue, or even a prequel set during the Dutch Van der Linde Gang’s peak. However, these concepts might not be the most effective for the game, and while “RDR3” would likely be commercially successful, over-reliance on this intellectual property could result in diminishing returns.

Why Red Dead Redemption Should Be Put To Rest

The Red Dead Redemption Story Has Nowhere Else To Go

In a different take on words, Red Dead Redemption 3 might center around Jack Marston post the first game’s events. However, considering the setting of the ‘Red Dead’ universe has reached the 1920s by then, it wouldn’t be the ideal era for an outlaw like Jack to thrive in America. Furthermore, both Jack and fan favorites Sadie Adler and Charles Smith could use a chance to move on from their outlaw days.

Sadie, for instance, might find herself leading an adventurous life as a bounty hunter in South America. As for Charles, his peaceful retirement could be disrupted by some malicious influence. Although it’s intriguing to imagine these scenarios, it might be more captivating to simply speculate about them rather than witness their unfolding.

Reusing these characters in new games might transform them from fully-fleshed, complex, believable entities into mere tools for generating fresh content. For instance, a prequel to Red Dead Redemption 2 or a spin-off delving into the final destinies of certain characters could strip the initial narrative of its enigmatic allure and intellectual stimulation. Instead of visualizing the Van der Linde Gang’s past before Dutch lost his sanity, we would have factual accounts. Leaving questions about the conclusion to characters like Sadie’s story unanswered is more impactful than receiving clear-cut answers, as it leaves room for imagination and speculation.

It’s understandable that some gamers want to explore every detail, but this can actually conflict with good storytelling. Leaving certain mysteries unsolved can keep the audience engaged by allowing them to speculate and theorize, keeping their imagination fresh. Critics often argue that series like Assassin’s Creed and Call of Duty have been around too long, feeling more like commercial products than creative works. They claim these franchises have been exploited, which could potentially happen to Red Dead Redemption if Rockstar doesn’t know when to stop expanding it. In essence, not every video game franchise needs a multi-decade run, and some can suffer due to excessive expansion.

Rockstar Would Limit Itself by Focusing On Red Dead Redemption 3

Critics often argue that Rockstar Games has been overly focused on GTA Online at the expense of exploring or revisiting other successful franchises like L.A. Noire and Bully. It’s possible that Rockstar is so fixated on its popular crime series, but those eager for Red Dead Redemption 3 might not see that they are inadvertently reinforcing this narrow perspective. Rockstar has continued to invest in GTA Online because players crave more GTA content; if players express a desire for more Red Dead, they may indeed receive it, but at the potential cost of other imaginative projects.

Read More

2025-04-07 00:04