XRP Lawsuit: SEC’s Ethereum Investigation Conclusion Bolsters Ripple’s Position

As a seasoned crypto investor with a keen interest in regulatory developments, I find the recent turn of events regarding Ethereum and Ripple’s legal battles against the SEC intriguing. The SEC’s decision to drop its investigation into Ethereum has sparked optimism among XRP supporters, myself included. Pro-XRP lawyers like James Murphy (MetaLawMan) and Bill Morgan have highlighted the potential implications of this development for Ripple’s ongoing legal battle.


XRP Legal Update: The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has announced the termination of its probe into Ethereum, potentially boosting Ripple‘s position in its ongoing court case. This news, as pointed out by legal expert MetaLawMan, has sparked renewed hope among XRP advocates. However, some analysts argue that the SEC’s decision to end Ethereum’s investigation based on its classification as a decentralized platform highlights the regulatory inconsistencies concerning various cryptocurrencies.

SEC’s Stance on Ethereum Bolsters Ripple Position

As a crypto investor, I’ve been following the developments between Ethereum and the SEC closely. The recent news of the SEC halting its investigation into Ethereum has left many in the community raising questions, especially those supporting Ripple in its ongoing lawsuit with the regulatory body. James Murphy, also known as MetaLawMan, a prominent pro-XRP lawyer, has pointed out that this decision could potentially strengthen Ripple’s defense in their legal battle with the SEC.

Murphy points out that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has shown growing discrepancies in how it handles digital assets. In a recent blog post, Murphy brought attention to the inconsistent arguments presented by the SEC during the Coinbase hearing versus their position on Ethereum.

The man stated that during the Coinbase hearing, the SEC repeatedly and effectively made the point that “a digital asset combined with its associated ecosystem equals security.” Yet, in the Ethereum case, which shares similar characteristics, the SEC reached a different verdict, declaring it was not considered a security. He has criticized the SEC for their inconsistent stance in these two instances, labeling it as “embarrassing.”

Concurrently, the attorney advocating for XRP makes his comments as Ripple’s legal team readies for a potential appeal in their ongoing case. The terminated Ethereum investigation might bolster Ripple’s contention that the SEC’s regulatory stance is inconsistent.

MetaLawMan holds the view that this latest development may strengthen Ripple’s stance in potential future lawsuits. He plans to delve deeper into this topic during an upcoming Crypto Town Hall discussion.

Pro-XRP Sentiment Grows Amid SEC Criticism

The SEC’s ruling on Ethereum has not only strengthened Ripple’s legal position but also sparked controversy over the regulatory body’s management of cryptocurrency cases. Lawyer Bill Morgan, who supports XRP, has joined the chorus of criticism, branding the SEC’s seemingly disparate treatment of Ethereum and Ripple as “arbitrary.” He highlights an inconsistency in the SEC’s decision-making process.

Furthermore, Morgan’s displeasure goes beyond American shores. Lately, he has voiced criticism towards the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), allegedly mirroring the SEC’s approach on cryptocurrency regulations.

During his fiery speech, he accused the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission of being overly restrictive in regulating cryptocurrencies. He went as far as labeling it the “most backward-looking” regulatory authority in this sphere. Moreover, he did not hold back from criticizing Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and his government for their handling of digital assets.

In the interim, the perceived discrepancy between regulatory approaches towards digital assets carries substantial consequences for this sector. Ripple’s backers contend that the SEC’s shifting view on Ethereum could align with last year’s XRP court decision. This alignment implies that certain digital assets might not fit the definition of securities, thereby influencing how future regulations will be shaped.

Read More

2024-06-19 17:20