Ripple Lawsuit: XRP Lawyer Highlights Judge Torres ‘Influence’ In FIT 21 Bill

As a researcher with experience in the crypto industry, I find Bill Morgan’s recent commentary on Judge Torres’ ruling and its impact on the FIT 21 bill particularly intriguing. The ongoing Ripple vs. SEC lawsuit has been a hot topic in the digital asset community, and Morgan’s perspective adds valuable insight to the discussion.


As a researcher following the developments in the ongoing legal battle between Ripple and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), I’ve observed that recent remarks from pro-XRP lawyer Bill Morgan have rekindled intense discussions among observers. Lately, an unexpected twist emerged in the case as the SEC submitted its response to Ripple’s request to seal and redact certain evidence related to remedies-bound briefs and documents.

Bill Morgan recently commented on Judge Torres’s decision concerning the classification of XRP as a security.

Judge Torres’ Ruling and Its Impact on FIT 21

The FIT 21 legislation has been generating buzz in the cryptocurrency sector as a prospective blueprint for bringing regulatory certainty to digital assets. Lately, the U.S. House of Representatives held a vote on this groundbreaking, bipartisan crypto bill – a pivotal move toward establishing a transparent regulatory landscape for digital assets.

As an analyst, I’ve noticed that during this debate, Bill Morgan, a pro-XRP lawyer, drew attention to Judge Torres’ impact on the Financial Institutions Tax and Trade Act of 2021 (FIT21). Specifically, he emphasized her ruling that XRP is not an inherent security. To put it another way, I observed that Morgan underscored the significance of Judge Torres’ decision regarding XRP’s status in the context of FIT21, stating on the X platform, “Judge Torres influenced FIT21: XRP is not a security in and of itself.”

The highlighted portion of the bill states that if a digital asset is traded or moved in accordance with an investment contract, it will not transform into a security.

Ripple Lawsuit: XRP Lawyer Highlights Judge Torres ‘Influence’ In FIT 21 Bill

In alignment with Judge Torres’ ruling in the Ripple versus SEC case, this part closely resonates. Her determination was that XRP as a digital asset itself does not qualify as a security, but its sale or proposition to financial institutions could potentially be categorized as such. This significant distinction has shaped the discourse surrounding the regulation of digital assets.

Ripple Lawsuit: Legal Strategy and Community Support

As a researcher studying the dynamic interplay between cryptocurrencies and regulatory frameworks, I’ve witnessed firsthand the pivotal role that the Ripple community has played in advocating for clear-cut regulations in this domain. Legal experts and supporters within this community have been at the forefront of pushing for progress, with their efforts significantly contributing to the creation of the FIT 21 bill. The high-profile lawsuit between Ripple and the SEC, as well as the unwavering dedication of the XRP community, have served as catalysts for this legislative development.

The report from CryptoLaw noted that Judge Torres’ ruling and the ongoing calls for clarity from the XRP community significantly influenced the drafting of the bill’s provisions regarding digital assets. Particularly, the part explaining how digital assets are classified based on investment contracts aligns with the legal debates and outcomes from the Ripple lawsuit.

In a separate discussion, the legal representative for Ripple addressed apprehensions regarding the FIT 21 bill. He emphasized that this legislation does not apply retroactively. Morgan made it clear that the recent court ruling, which declared XRP as not being a security, is unaffected by the SEC’s stance on the new bill.

As an analyst, I’d like to highlight that Morgan’s remarks were made in reaction to a post suggesting that under the newly passed FIT 21 bill, XRP would no longer be considered decentralized. However, Morgan’s perspective emphasizes that this legislation will not impact the current court rulings concerning XRP’s legal standing.

Read More

2024-05-23 11:05