Tokenized Assets? SEC Says They Still Fall Under Securities – ‘Crypto Mom’ Speaks

by

Ah, the plot thickens, my dear friends, and it’s not just your average bowl of porridge. It seems that the ever-watchful Hester ‘Crypto Mom’ Peirce, the SEC commissioner with a penchant for cryptographic curiosities, has a few words of wisdom for anyone thinking of dabbling in the world of tokenized assets. In a statement that would make even the most hardened of financial professionals clutch their pearls, she declared that any firm planning to dive into the tokenization game should have a nice little chat with the regulators first. Oh yes, you must clear it with the SEC before you even think about minting those shiny little tokens tied to stocks or funds. No exceptions, folks. The SEC’s crypto task force has spoken. 🔒

Peirce Reminds Firms Of Federal Rules

In a move so timely it could have been scripted by an overzealous dramaturge, Peirce issued this warning a mere fortnight after Robinhood unveiled its shiny new layer‑2 blockchain. You see, dear reader, Robinhood had the audacity to propose a framework for tokenizing real‑world assets, and Peirce, with all the enthusiasm of a cat guarding a fish market, was quick to remind them and others that blockchain, while nifty, doesn’t magically turn stocks into something they’re not. Tokenized securities, as we all know, are still securities under the law—rules and regs still apply! Magic wands don’t work here, folks. 🪄

“Blockchain, for all its might, does not transform the fundamental nature of the asset,” Peirce proclaimed with the gravitas of someone who’s seen one too many people get caught in a digital web. Tokenized securities are still securities, and that means they must adhere to the same rules that govern your grandma’s stock portfolio. No getting around that! 📜

Of course, we’ve heard similar musings from the SEC’s former chair, Gary Gensler, who, in his day, often took to telling token projects to “come in and talk.” Well, folks, Peirce is clearly carrying that torch. 🔥

Crypto Assets

Now, Peirce was too polite to call out Robinhood by name—after all, that wouldn’t be the kind of decorum you expect from someone of her stature—but the timing of her statement couldn’t have been more transparent. Robinhood, in a move that would make even a seasoned regulator raise an eyebrow, had filed a proposal in May to set up a framework for tokenized real‑world assets under US rules. Talk about gall! 🧐

And yes, Robinhood’s grand plans are sweeping across the Atlantic as well. They aim to allow their European users to trade tokens tied to US stocks and ETFs—big names like Apple and the S&P 500. Fancy, no? 🍏📈

House Republicans Push Clarity For Crypto Rules

But wait—there’s more! Not content with just SEC involvement, lawmakers on Capitol Hill are rubbing their hands together in glee, preparing to vote on the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act. This bill, if passed, would establish clear lines between what falls under the SEC’s watchful eye and what is left to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. How convenient! 😏

Crypto Rules

If this bill passes, it could bring clarity to the chaos, categorizing “digital commodities,” “securities,” and “stablecoins” with such precision, one might think it was drawn up by an overly enthusiastic librarian. Supporters claim it would help tokenization backers navigate the murky waters of legal uncertainty, giving them a clear path ahead. But let’s not get too excited. The road to clarity is paved with paperwork, my friends. 📑

Peirce, ever the realist, did hint that the SEC might be open to updating the old playbook. “We stand ready to work with market participants to craft appropriate exemptions and modernize rules,” she said, ever the optimist. But until that day comes, any token tied to a share or ETF will have to follow the same standards as your old-fashioned, paper-based securities. No shortcuts. 🏛️

Tokenization Brings Both Promise And Risks

Now, let’s talk about the bright side, because it’s not all doom and gloom. Tokenized securities could, in theory, reduce settlement times from the traditional two days to nearly instantaneously. And yes, they could open up markets for small investors, which is a bit of a game changer. The idea sounds like something out of a futuristic novel, doesn’t it? But, as with all things too good to be true, there’s a catch. Buyers must trust custodians who hold the actual assets. If the custodian has a slip-up, well, let’s just say your tokens might be as useful as a chocolate teapot. 🍫

Read More

2025-07-12 03:45