One of the biggest mysteries in finance is not just who Satoshi Nakamoto is-it’s why the guy who invented Bitcoin, who owns a fortune that could buy every Starbucks in the world, isn’t on Forbes’ billionaire list. 🤯
Forbes, the publication that turned “billionaire” into a cultural obsession, has drawn a line in the sand-and it’s not because they’re bad at math. 🧮
Forbes’ Billionaire Rankings: Still Clinging to 20th-Century Nonsense
Bitcoin’s currently trading at $110k, so Satoshi’s 1.1 million BTC? That’s $121 billion. More than enough to rival Elon Musk and Bernard Arnault. 💸
Yet, Satoshi’s name is nowhere to be found. Why? Because Forbes can’t confirm if he’s a person, a team, or a ghost. 🧟♂️
“We can’t verify if Satoshi is a living person or a collective,” said Forbes, because obviously, that’s the real issue here. 🤷♀️
This reveals a major flaw: wealth is measured by who you are, not what you own. In an age where blockchain is basically a digital diary, Forbes is still stuck in the “show me your ID” era. 🧑💼
Satoshi isn’t excluded because his money isn’t real. He’s excluded because he doesn’t fit Forbes’ “story.” 📖
Satoshi’s Ghost Fortune: A Blockchain Paradox
Forbes isn’t anti-crypto-they list crypto billionaires like CZ and Justin Sun. But they’re still stuck in the “name and paperwork” mindset. 📄
“We value crypto like any other asset,” said Forbes. *Sarcasm* detected. 🤡
Offshore trusts and shell companies? Fine. But Satoshi? No name, no passport, just keys on a blockchain. The most transparent fortune ever, yet somehow less legitimate. 🧐
People have tried to unmask Satoshi for years. Theories? HBO documentaries, Nick Szabo, Craig Wright, Jack Dorsey… all just guesses. 🕵️♂️
Still no proof. Just a bunch of “I think it’s him” vibes. 🤷♀️
Experts: Justified or Outdated?
Bryan Trepanier says it’s “common sense” to exclude Satoshi because his coins are dormant. *Dormant?* More like “waiting for the perfect moment to crash the market.” 🚨
“Wealth isn’t just about what you hold-it’s about what you do with it,” said Trepanier. So, basically, if you’re not spending it, you’re not rich. 🛍️
But others argue Forbes is out of touch. Mete Al says, “Why exclude Satoshi when his coins are visible to everyone?” 🧭
Ray Youssef warns Forbes risks becoming irrelevant. “The digital age doesn’t care about your old rules,” he said. 🌐
“Satoshi’s story shows how much the world has changed. Forbes needs to catch up or get left behind.” 🚀
Measuring Power in the Digital Era
Satoshi’s absence hides just how much influence pseudonymous wealth has. A single transaction from his wallets? Headlines and chaos. 📣
Mete Al says ignoring him blinds people to crypto’s power. Nikita Zuborev added, “Traditional wealth = identity. Digital wealth = math. Which one’s real?” 🤔
“Forbes is stuck in the 20th century. The rest of us are in the future.” 🌍
Why It Matters
Satoshi’s exclusion isn’t just a technicality-it’s a battle between old and new. Forbes = identity. Satoshi = math. 🧮
By leaving him off the list, Forbes says, “We still run the show.” But crypto is rewriting the rules. 🔄
So, will Forbes evolve? Or will they become the next dinosaurs? 🦖
Read More
- Violence District Killer and Survivor Tier List
- All Data Pad Locations (Week 1) Destiny 2
- Jujutsu Kaisen Season 3: Get Ready for Epic Battles Like Never Before!
- Gold Rate Forecast
- Unleash Devastation: Top Rupture Teams to Dominate in Limbus Company!
- Top 8 UFC 5 Perks Every Fighter Should Use
- A Collegial Mystery Safe Code – Indiana Jones The Order of Giants
- Top 7 Custom Maps in 7 Days to Die You Need to Play Now
- EUR AUD PREDICTION
- Demon Slayer: Infinity Castle Part 2 Release Date: What to Expect
2025-09-02 15:03