Tolstoy’s Take on Crypto and AI: A Tale of Two Techs

by

What to know, dear reader, is that the world of investment, ever a theater of folly, now finds itself torn between two specters: cryptocurrency and artificial intelligence. One is a beast of chaos, the other a creature of calculated order. Yet both, in their own way, promise to reshape the earth, or so the optimists claim.

  • Tech investor Imran Khan, a man whose name glimmers faintly in the annals of Silicon Valley, declares with the solemnity of a priest that cryptocurrency holds little sway in his AI investments. To him, crypto and AI are as different as a lion and a lamb-both animals, yet one devours the other.
  • His firm, Proem Asset Management, bets on AI as if it were the next Industrial Revolution, while crypto, he says, is but a footnote in the grand opera of technology. Their investments in Coinbase and Robinhood? Merely a nod to the chaos, not a leap of faith.
  • Khan, with the wisdom of a man who has seen Snapchat ascend to greatness, scoffs at the notion that AI will erase jobs. “Has not every machine ever invented,” he intones, “been met with the same despair? And yet, here we are, still breathing.”

Imran Khan, a man who once steered Snap toward its gilded IPO, now speaks of cryptocurrency with the disdain of a man who has tasted fine wine and found it sour. “Crypto is a different animal,” he proclaims, as if he alone has deciphered the sacred texts of finance. In truth, it is less a beast and more a trickster, darting through the markets like a fox in a henhouse.

Yet Khan is no fool. His firm, Proem, with $450 million under management, dabbles in crypto tokens as one might dabble in fireworks-aware of the risk, but too intrigued to look away. Their latest 13F filing reveals holdings in Coinbase and bitcoin miners, though these are not part of their AI grand strategy. They are, Khan insists, mere diversions in the broader saga of tech.

The Illusion of Convergence

Some, with minds as feverish as a March hare’s, argue that AI and crypto will unite. They speak of blockchains as the nervous system for AI, of stablecoins replacing credit cards in a brave new world. Citrini Research, in a report that sent shockwaves through Wall Street, dared to suggest that AI agents might bypass banks entirely. A bold vision, if one ignores the fact that such dreams are as tangible as a mirage in the desert.

Meanwhile, bitcoin miners, ever the opportunists, have repurposed their data centers into AI farms, as if mining for profit were not profitable enough. And NYDIG, with the audacity of a poet, claims that if AI cuts jobs, it might force central banks to print money, thus inflating bitcoin’s value. A logic so convoluted it would make a philosopher weep.

The Bubble That Wasn’t

Khan’s words arrive as the AI boom, once hailed as the next great revolution, shows signs of cracking. Nvidia and Broadcom, the titans of the AI chip world, have faltered. The Citrini report, a modern-day Cassandra, painted a dystopian future of jobless masses and collapsing consumer spending. Yet Khan, with the patience of a man who has read Marx’s Capital twice, dismisses the fear as nothing new.

“Marx himself,” Khan says, “spoke of machines devouring labor. And yet, here we are, still working, still arguing, still pretending we are not all doomed.”

He is right, of course. Every revolution births new jobs, even as it buries the old. But what of the soul? What of the human spirit, crushed beneath the gears of progress? Perhaps that is the true question, though no one dares ask it in boardrooms filled with spreadsheets and short-term gains.

Read More

2026-03-09 16:31