TRON Proposal 106: Major SELFDESTRUCT Rule Changes and Higher Energy Costs Set to Shake Up Network!

by

TRON Proposal 106 Vote Begins With Major SELFDESTRUCT Changes

Voting has started on TRON Proposal 106, which will update how contracts are deleted, change the rules around the SELFDESTRUCT function, and adjust energy costs. These changes are designed to make TRON more compatible with the TVM (Tron Virtual Machine).

TRON has started voting for Proposal No. 106, which introduces changes to the SELFDESTRUCT opcode.

This update changes how contracts are deleted and how much energy transactions cost. Developers and anyone involved in the network should read the full proposal to understand the changes.

These changes aim to improve compatibility between TRON Virtual Machine (TVM) and Ethereum.

Contract Deletion Rules and Transaction Handling

The plan states that a contract can only be removed if its creation and removal happen within the same transaction.

If that doesn’t happen, the contract will remain on the blockchain even as the assets are transferred. This update ensures that contracts aren’t accidentally deleted after they’ve been put in place.

Developers are advised to adjust contract logic and test applications on test networks.

A developer working on TRON explained that even as digital assets are transferred, transactions are still trackable, bringing TRON’s functionality more in line with how Ethereum operates.

By keeping contracts visible, the network improves transparency and reliability.

You’ll still be able to access past contract information, so everyone can check their transaction history.

As a researcher, I’ve found this update is really important for keeping reliable records, which is crucial for both auditing and keeping track of system performance. Essentially, it guarantees that our contracts aren’t lost or invalidated when assets are transferred, providing a continuous and dependable record.

This adjustment may affect projects that rely on immediate contract deletion.

Teams should check their contracts to see how they handle the transfer of assets. The suggestion is to manage contracts more systematically throughout their entire lifespan.

Energy Cost of SELFDESTRUCT Will Increase to 5,000

Proposal 106 would change the cost of deleting a smart contract (using SELFDESTRUCT). Right now, it’s free to do, but this proposal would make it cost 5,000 units of energy.

This change reflects the resources required to process such transactions.

The TRON Foundation explained that the updated energy costs more accurately represent the computing power used and will encourage more efficient use of the network.

Developers need to accurately estimate the energy costs when using the SELFDESTRUCT function in their contracts. Revising the contract’s design can help avoid failed transactions and unexpected problems.

Voting for TRON Proposal No. 106 has been initiated.

This proposal changes how the SELFDESTRUCT command works and its associated costs. Now, a contract will only be fully removed from the blockchain if the deletion command is used within the same transaction that created it. If not, only the contract’s assets will be transferred, and the contract code will remain on the blockchain.

— TRON DAO (@trondao)

Nodes that do not upgrade software could face issues executing these transactions.

Keeping your node up-to-date is important for accurate energy cost calculations. This helps keep the network running smoothly, especially when deleting accounts.

In addition, developers should plan energy budgets for frequent contract deletions.

Good planning helps prevent problems with transactions and keeps things running smoothly. This update emphasizes managing resources carefully throughout the system.

Read Also:

Tron Inc Doubles Down on TRX as Crypto Conviction Grows

Node Upgrades and Developer Preparations

All TRON nodes should upgrade to version 4.8.1 before the network implements the proposal.

This update fixes how the network handles certain rules, preventing potential problems like syncing issues and failed transactions for users.

Developers should also check over existing smart contracts, particularly those that depend on data being deleted right away.

Testing on test networks can confirm that asset transfers work as intended. 

This proposal also helps improve interoperability with Ethereum-based systems.

By aligning contract behavior, developers can port contracts between TRON and Ethereum more easily.

It simplifies cross-chain integration and ensures consistent contract execution.

Voting for Proposal 106 is now open, and TRON stakeholders can cast votes to approve or reject it.

Participants should stay updated with announcements from the TRON Foundation.

Preparing contracts and nodes ahead of time will ensure smooth implementation.

Read More

2026-04-07 19:59