Ripple Vs. SEC Settlement: Here Are The Things You Should Know Going Forward

As a seasoned researcher with extensive experience in the crypto and legal spheres, I must say that this Ripple-SEC saga has been quite intriguing to follow. The recent ruling, while seemingly a win for Ripple, is far from over as both parties have the option to appeal within 60 days.


The ongoing legal dispute between Ripple and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has reached a temporary resolution with Judge Analisa Torres’ recent decision imposing a $125 million fine on the cryptocurrency company. This verdict carries significant implications for both parties, and it is possible that appeals from either side may follow.

What Next For Ripple And The SEC

Ripple has been ordered by the SEC to pay a penalty of $125 million for breaking securities regulations. The breach occurred because Ripple sold XRP to large investors without first registering these transactions as investment contracts. In a ruling last year, Judge Torres determined that Ripple had violated securities laws in its institutional sales, but she also stated that XRP itself is not considered a security.

According to the court’s decisions, this case, which started in December 2020, seems to favor Ripple over the SEC more than previously anticipated. Although Ripple is required to pay the SEC a sum of $125 million, this fine is significantly less than the initial $2 billion suggested by the Commission. In fact, Ripple had proposed a penalty of only $10 million, but given their financial capabilities, paying $125 million should not present any issues for them.

As a researcher reporting on recent financial developments, I’d like to share some insights from an interview with Stuart Alderoty, Ripple’s Chief Legal Officer (CLO). In this conversation, Alderoty clarified that Ripple is prepared to fulfill the $125 million fine imposed by the court. He emphasized their eagerness to expedite this payment and continue with their business operations smoothly. While he didn’t specify an exact date for the payment, Alderoty confirmed that the funds would be drawn from their available resources – essentially, they will pay it out of pocket.

As a researcher, I’d like to point out that in addition to the $125 million penalty, Judge Torres also granted an injunction preventing future violations. Similar to the civil fine, this injunction is straightforward and poses no issue for Ripple, as Alderoty referred to it as a “comply with the law order.” Essentially, this means that Ripple is now legally obligated to adhere to all relevant laws moving forward.

Patrick Daugherty from Foley and Lardner pointed out that the injunction order wasn’t clear about offering specific guidance for Ripple, as Judge Torres didn’t specify whether Ripple had broken securities laws with its On-Demand Liquidity (ODL) service. Instead, Judge Torres merely suggested that the ODL service might border on violating federal securities regulations.

An Appeal Is Still Possible

60 days after the decision’s release, either party can file an appeal. Ripple might focus its appeal on the ruling concerning institutional sales, while the SEC could concentrate on Judge Torres’ ruling regarding secondary sales by Rippe. However, Alderoty mentioned that Ripple may not choose to appeal, as they view Judge Torres’ recent judgment as the conclusion of this case.

Brad Garlinghouse, CEO of Ripple, expressed satisfaction with the court’s decision based on a post he made on his social media platform (previously known as Twitter), which he referred to as a win for Ripple, the industry, and legal fairness. Conversely, the SEC’s statement after the ruling indicated that they have no plans to file an appeal.

As an analyst, I found it intriguing when Alderoty suggested that if the SEC acted rationally and this administration was genuinely committed to restarting the crypto sector, there would be no appeal in response to Judge Torres’ decision classifying secondary sales as non-investment contracts. However, a legal expert I consulted believes the Commission may challenge this ruling, viewing it as a harmful precedent for their regulatory efforts.

Ripple Vs. SEC Settlement: Here Are The Things You Should Know Going Forward

Read More

2024-08-16 19:27