SEC’s Meme Coin Ruling: A Comedy of Errors or a Stroke of Genius?

by

In the grand theater of the financial world, where the actors are often cloaked in the garb of legality and the audience is left in a state of bewilderment, Stuart Alderoty, the chief legal officer of Ripple, has taken to the stage. He has offered his thoughts on the recent decree issued by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, a body that seems to oscillate between wisdom and folly, regarding the curious category of digital assets known as meme coins.

With a flourish of optimism, Alderoty has embraced the SEC’s latest pronouncement on these whimsical tokens, which have captured the hearts and wallets of many. This decision, he suggests, is a sign that the regulatory agency is finally laying down its arms in the ongoing skirmish with the crypto realm—a conflict ignited by the previous chairman, Gary Gensler, whose tenure was marked by a certain zeal that bordered on the absurd.

Meme coins: The Collectibles of Our Time

In a press release that could only be described as a modern-day parable, the SEC has defined a meme coin as “a type of crypto asset inspired by internet memes, characters, current events, or trends for which the promoter seeks to attract an enthusiastic online community to purchase the meme coin and engage in its trading.” Ah, the beauty of the digital age, where even the most trivial of pursuits can be elevated to the status of investment!

Furthermore, the SEC has declared that the act of selling meme coins does not constitute an investment contract, nor does it imply “a reasonable expectation of profits to be derived from the entrepreneurial or managerial efforts of others.” In essence, they have deemed these coins as mere collectibles, akin to the trinkets one might find in a dusty attic, valued not by their intrinsic worth but by the whims of the market and the collective sentiment of the masses.

Alderoty’s Enthusiastic Endorsement

With a twinkle in his eye, Alderoty has praised this classification, extolling “the beauty” of the SEC’s statement. He emphasizes the simplicity that lies at its heart, suggesting that the agency is now operating within the bounds of its jurisdiction without overstepping into the realm of the absurd. “MemeCoins aren’t securities because they don’t confer rights to income, profits, or assets,” he asserts, as if revealing a profound truth that had eluded the masses for far too long. “This doesn’t have to be complicated,” he adds, as if to reassure the bewildered public that clarity is indeed within reach.

The beauty of the SEC’s statement on MemeCoins is its simplicity. The question for the SEC is whether something falls under its jurisdiction—not whether it’s legal or illegal. If fraud occurs, other agencies can act.

The guidance sticks to law and precedent, avoiding vague…

— Stuart Alderoty (@s_alderoty) February 28, 2025

In a delightful twist, the prominent venture capitalist and crypto enthusiast, Anthony Pompliano, has also weighed in on this decision. He quips that if the SEC now deems meme coins as “collectibles,” then surely, “every asset will become a collectible over time.” One can only imagine the day when even the most mundane of possessions is elevated to the status of a prized collectible, all thanks to the whims of regulatory definitions.

The SEC’s Retreat from Legal Battles

In a surprising turn of events, the Securities and Exchange Commission has recently chosen to drop several significant legal cases against notable crypto companies, a move that many attribute to the departure of Gary Gensler, who resigned in January. The regulator has dismissed cases against Coinbase, Robinhood, and Uniswap, and just yesterday, the legal action against Consensus was also laid to rest. The community now holds its breath, eagerly anticipating the next chapter in this unfolding saga, with hopes that the Ripple case will soon follow suit.

Read More

2025-02-28 18:09