Valve Rejects Gambling Claims in New York Loot Box Lawsuit

by

Valve has publicly responded to a lawsuit filed by New York Attorney General Letitia James. The lawsuit claims Valve encourages illegal gambling through “loot boxes” in games like Counter-Strike 2, Dota 2, and Team Fortress 2. The Attorney General argues these loot boxes are a form of gambling because players pay for a chance to win valuable in-game items.

The lawsuit claims that opening cases in Counter-Strike 2 is similar to gambling on a slot machine. Players buy cases hoping to win cosmetic items, and the game uses a spinning wheel to randomly determine what they receive. While these items don’t affect gameplay, they can be resold for real money on online marketplaces.

The legal complaint points to an instance where a digital skin for an AK-47 weapon allegedly sold for over $1 million. Investigators believe selling these cosmetic items is similar to gambling because players are essentially paying for a chance to win something valuable. The lawsuit further alleges that Valve has profited significantly – in the billions of dollars – by encouraging players to chase after these rare digital rewards.

Attorney General Letitia James argues that certain game features can expose children and teenagers to experiences similar to gambling. Her office points to research showing that early exposure to these kinds of systems increases the risk of developing gambling addiction later on. The legal complaint alleges that Valve’s games motivate players to hunt for valuable virtual items, making this pursuit seem rewarding.

The lawsuit asks the court for several actions to address what the Attorney General claims is illegal gambling happening within Valve’s games. These include a permanent stop to the promotion of this gambling, as well as requests for Valve to give up any profits made, pay fines, and compensate users who were harmed. The case focuses on whether the way items are rewarded and sold in the games legally qualifies as gambling under New York law.

On March 11th, Valve released a public statement on the Steam Support page to address players. While they don’t usually comment on legal matters, the company felt it was important to explain their side of the story to users.

So, I saw that the New York Attorney General is suing Valve, and it’s about those crates, cases, and chests we get in some games. Apparently, they’re claiming these mystery boxes break New York’s gambling laws. Honestly, Valve doesn’t agree with that at all. They’ve actually been trying to explain how these virtual items and boxes work to the NYAG since early 2023, and they were pretty bummed to see the lawsuit filed after all that effort.

Valve says it cooperated with the Attorney General’s investigation from the start, sharing details about how its item systems work. The company points out that random rewards are a standard practice in collecting, whether it’s for digital or physical items.

Valve explained to the New York Attorney General that the surprise mechanics in their games are common practice. They pointed out that people have been collecting and trading items from things like baseball card packs and mystery boxes for generations, both in the digital and physical worlds.

Okay, so Valve is basically saying these systems are like collecting physical stuff – think baseball cards, Pokémon, Magic: The Gathering, even those Labubu toys. And they pointed out that digital packs, kinda like loot boxes, have been around in games since 2004 – they’re super common, actually! It’s something a lot of us gamers have seen for years.

Valve clarifies that opening cases is entirely optional. You can enjoy playing Counter-Strike 2, Dota 2, and Team Fortress 2 without spending any money on them.

Valve has clarified that players aren’t required to buy loot boxes to enjoy their games. They point out that the majority of players don’t purchase them, and there’s no gameplay penalty for those who don’t, as the items inside are only for appearance.

Valve also explained how it’s working to stop gambling websites from using items from Steam as money. They say they’ve been investigating and taking action against accounts connected to these services for years, following the rules users agree to when using Steam.

“Valve does not cooperate with gambling sites,” the company stated.

Valve announced it has secured over a million Steam accounts that were compromised and used for unauthorized activities like gambling, scams, and theft. They also detailed new systems designed to keep users safe and prevent future abuse.

Steam now offers two features to improve security. Trade reversal lets users undo Marketplace trades made within the last week. Trade cooldown introduces a waiting period before you can trade newly obtained items. Valve explains these changes are designed to limit the activity of gambling sites that use Steam accounts and items.

Valve also prohibits companies involved in gambling from sponsoring or taking part in tournaments for its games.

Valve disagreed with some ideas presented by the Attorney General’s office. One idea would limit the trading of items won from loot boxes. Investigators believe allowing these items to be traded supports the argument that loot boxes are a form of gambling, since players can turn those rewards into real money by selling them online.

Valve disagreed with that understanding, explaining that allowing items to be transferred and resold benefits customers.

The company believes letting players sell or trade their virtual items benefits consumers. They explained that players should have the right to do what they want with their items and that they won’t take that right away.

As a fan, I thought it was really smart how Valve explained digital item trading. They likened it to collecting things like Pokémon or baseball cards – you open packs, get something cool, and then maybe trade it with friends or sell it if you want. It just makes sense when you think about it like that!

Valve and the Attorney General’s office also disagree on how to verify users. The Attorney General’s office proposed collecting more information to ensure New York residents aren’t using VPNs or other methods to get around location-based restrictions.

The company explained that the New York Attorney General’s office requested extra user data – beyond what’s typically collected for payment processing – to investigate whether anyone in New York was hiding their location to avoid restrictions.

Valve explained that putting these safeguards in place would need intrusive technology that would affect users globally. They also argued against additional age checks, pointing out that most Steam customers in New York already verify their age when making purchases.

Valve understands its users are concerned about keeping their personal information safe. The company believes it’s best for everyone – both Valve and its users – to only gather the data needed to run the business and follow the law.

The statement also responded to claims made in the lawsuit that linked video games to violent acts in real life.

Valve stated that the unnecessary comments are distracting and simply repeat old, inaccurate claims. They also pointed out that research consistently shows no connection between any form of media – like movies, TV, books, comics, music, or video games – and violent behavior in the real world.

Valve revealed they chose not to settle with the Attorney General’s office, even though they had the opportunity to do so.

Valve acknowledged that settling with the New York Attorney General’s office could have been simpler and less expensive. However, they decided against it, believing the terms the NYAG would require would ultimately harm players, other game creators, and Valve’s own ability to develop new and creative game designs.

Valve has said it will follow any new laws in New York regarding loot boxes if lawmakers decide to pass them. Currently, no such laws exist, though the idea has been discussed before.

The company stated it will follow any laws regarding mystery boxes that the New York legislature might pass – though lawmakers haven’t created any yet, despite discussing the issue several times. Any such laws would likely be developed through a public process, with feedback from both the gaming industry and New York players.

Valve stated that a court will eventually determine whether their stance or the New York Attorney General’s is accurate. They also wanted to inform users about how this situation could affect them, particularly those in New York and potentially in other locations.

Full Text 2/2:

We acknowledge New York’s authority to create its own laws. If the New York legislature decides to regulate mystery boxes – something they’ve discussed but haven’t yet done – we will fully comply. Any such laws would…

— gencobra (@gencobraCS) March 11, 2026

The lawsuit in New York isn’t the only legal issue surrounding these systems. Another case, filed in Washington state, makes similar arguments about how loot boxes in games are designed to be manipulative.

Read More

2026-03-13 11:48